| When
Iris Chang parked her car on a lonely road in rural California two
years ago, placed the end of an antique revolver in her mouth and ended
her own life in a bout of depression, the celebrated young journalist
died having failed to answer a question that had haunted her most of
her adult life. Chang is most famous for "The Rape of Nanking," her
1997 New York Times bestseller and the first popular account, in
English, of the murder of more than 200,000 Chinese civilians at the
hands of Japanese soldiers in the run-up to World War II. In the
opening pages of that book, the author contemplated a riddle friends
say she never managed to solve: How did this massacre, one of the most
brutal and best documented wartime atrocities of the 20th century, go
ignored in the United States for six decades? Another decade
later, the people behind "Nanking," a documentary inspired by the book
that premiers today at the Sundance Film Festival, have no definitive
answers of their own. But they hope at least to extend Chang's effort
to cure the country's amnesia. "It's been called the 'forgotten
holocaust,'" says Bill Guttentag, who co-directed the film with
long-time collaborator Dan Sturman. "Those two words should never be in
the same sentence." While it may have been largely forgotten on
this side of the Pacific, the story is vividly familiar to most
Chinese. On December 10, 1937, Japanese troops arrived at gates of
Nanjing (current spelling), then the capital of Chiang Kai-shek's
Nationalist government, in a bid to incorporate China into Japan's
"Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere." Many expected the Japanese
would take the city peacefully, but instead the soldiers went on a
two-month rampage of mutilation, rape and murder that left only 300,000
alive in a city once home to more than twice that number. One
the most respected American scholars of Chinese history, Jonathan
Spence, has referred to the occupation of Nanjing as "a period of
terror and destruction that must rank among the worst in the history of
modern warfare." None of the main people behind "Nanking" knew
anything about the massacre before they started. Ted Leonsis, the AOL
vice-chairman who produced the film, says he came up with the idea
after encountering Chang's obituary in the New York Times by chance
while on vacation in the Caribbean. He'd thrown the paper away after
reading it, he says, but the obituary page stayed on top of the trash,
and her picture stared at him every time he walked by. Back home,
Leonsis read Chang's book and, shocked that he had never heard the
story, decided to revive it in film form. Looking for a feature-quality
documentary capable of reaching a wide audience, he tapped Guttenberg
and Sturman, winners of an Academy Award last year for the documentary
short "Twin Towers," to direct the project. To compensate for
their own lack of familiarity with the issue, the trio assembled a
massive team of researchers then spent six months scouring archives,
assembling old footage and photographs, and scouting for survivors and
veterans to interview. The film employed over 140 people all told,
according to the directors the largest crew either has ever used. The
filmmakers decided to build the film around the story of the "Safety
Zone" committee, a group of 22 resident foreigners who stayed behind in
Nanjing and set up a two-square mile safe area on the edge of city that
sheltered tens of thousands refugees from the Japanese onslaught. The
group included a number of fascinating figures, including John Rabe,
the local head of the Nazi Party who was later dubbed "the living
Buddha of Nanking" for the number of lives he saved, and Minnie
Vautrin, an American missionary who risked her own life on numerous
occasions to keep the city's women safe from rapacious soldiers. Vautrin, in a disturbing parallel with Chang, committed suicide shortly after leaving Nanjing. The
decision to concentrate on the Safety Zone, according to Leonisis, came
from a desire to examine the unexpected heroism war can produce, a
notion reflected in the film's slogan: "Even in the Darkest of Times,
There is Light." Members of the Safety Zone committee, all long
deceased, are "played" in the film by an impressive line-up of actors
(including Woody Harrelson and Jürgen Prachnow of Das Boot) reading
from the trove of letters and diaries the group left behind. Effective
as the technique is in adding life to the story of Nanjing's Western
heroes, the more striking and valuable part of "Nanking" lies in the
on-camera eyewitness accounts, as few of those who were there are still
alive. "If we hadn't done this now, there would have been no survivors left," says Leonsis. To
get the interviews, Guttenberg and Sturman spent over a month in Asia.
Most of that time was spent in China, where the pair managed to find 22
survivors of the massacre. Among them was Chang Zhiqiang (no relation
to Chang the writer), nine years old at the time of the invasion, whose
uninterrupted five-minute recollection of the killing of his mother is
arguably the film's defining moment. Meeting Chang, Sturman says, was
the most memorable experience of the project. "It just transcends
culture, the emotional devastation." Among the film's most
chilling moments is an interview with Teramoto Juhei, a Japanese
veteran who described the gang rapes he helped commit while stationed
in Nanjing with an almost gleeful air. When they met him, the directors
say, the old soldier was perfectly nice, with a welcoming family and a
collection of ceramic Disney figurines arranged in his garden. "It's
like the Hannah Arendt line about the banality of evil," Guttenberg
says of the encounter. "You walk up and see Snow White and the Seven
Dwarves and the guy can't stop shaking your hand." According the
observations of the foreigners who were there, roughly 20,000 Chinese
women some as young as 8, others as old as 70 were raped by soldiers in
the first two months of the occupation. In part because of
statistics like this and the refusal of extreme right-wingers in Japan
to acknowledge them the Rape of Nanjing remains a point of extreme
tension between China and Japan. Anger over the publication in Japanese
of new history textbooks that gloss over the episode was one of the
explanations floated for the massive anti-Japanese protests that spread
across China last year, and China has consistently blasted Japanese
leaders for making visits to the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo, where
military officers in charge of the Nanjing occupation are buried. Japan has yet to issue a formal apology for the atrocities. The
continued festering of the controversy, 70 years after the event, has
made it difficult for the filmmakers. Three associate producers in
Japan reportedly quit under pressure from friends and family members,
and both producer Leonsis and a Japanese actor in the movie have had
their personal blogs bombarded with comments railing against them for
perpetuating historical lies. Leonisis, however, remains
unbowed. He likens the critics to Holocaust deniers "a small group" and
rejects the notion that his film might inflame delicate relations
between the two East Asian powers. "I'm hoping this film will activate
discussion and will be a healthy thing," he says. "The world is small.
It's time to get over this." Screenings: Saturday, January 20 - The
Library Center Theatre - 2:30pm Sunday, January 21 - Holiday Village
Cinema III - 9:15pm Monday, January 22 - Rose Wagner Performing Arts
Center, SLC Wednesday, January 24 - Holiday Village Cinema II - 8:30am
Friday, January 26 - Holiday Village Cinema IV - 1:00pm |